Michelin Kesärenkaat Energy Saver+ 185/60R14 82H
Plussat ja miinukset
asiantuntijoidemme laatimana
Michelin Energy Saver+ 185/60R14 82H sopii erityisesti kuljettajille, joille polttoainetalous ja pienet CO2‑päästöt ovat tärkeitä. Erittäin pieni vierintävastus voi selvästi pienentää kulutusta tinkimättä täysin turvallisuudesta. Riippumattomat kuvaukset korostavat renkaan varmaa pitoa ja jarrutusta sekä kuivalla että märällä tiellä, vaikka painotus on selvästi taloudellisuudessa ja mukavuudessa. Siksi ajotuntuma on vähemmän urheilullinen kuin varsinaisissa suorituskykykesärenkaissa, ja osa kilpailijoista tarjoaa vielä paremman märkäpidon. Hinta on usein korkeampi kuin edullisilla merkeillä. Kuljettajalle, joka haluaa ennen kaikkea säästää polttoainetta ja ajaa mukavasti ja turvallisesti arjessa, rengas tarjoaa tasapainoisen vaihtoehdon ja selviä etuja tankatessa.
Michelin Kesärenkaat Energy Saver+ 185/60R14 82H -arvostelut
Perustuu 51 arvosteluun
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22. lokakuuta 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. huhtikuuta 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. huhtikuuta 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. tammikuuta 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. tammikuuta 2021
