Michelin EN SAVER + 175/70R14 84T kesärengas
Plussat ja miinukset
asiantuntijoidemme laatimana
Michelin Energy Saver+ 175/70R14 84T tunnetaan taloudellisena kesärenkaana pienille ja kompakteille autoille. Testit ja käyttäjäarviot korostavat erittäin pientä vierintävastusta, joka voi selvästi pienentää polttoaineenkulutusta ja CO₂‑päästöjä. Rengas saa kiitosta myös pitkästä käyttöiästä ja tasaisesta kulumisesta, mikä tekee siitä edullisen pitkällä aikavälillä. Kuivalla tiellä pito ja jarrutus ovat hyvin riittäviä ja turvallisen tuntuisia. Märällä suorituskyky on hyvä, muttei aivan luokan huipputasoa, koska painotus on enemmän taloudellisuudessa kuin äärimmäisessä märkäpidossa. Monet arvostavat myös mukavuutta ja melko pientä melua. On hyvä muistaa, että kyseessä on puhdas kesärengas ilman talvihyväksyntää, ja ohjaustuntuma voi tuntua vähemmän terävältä hyvin urheilullisessa ajossa.
Michelin EN SAVER + 175/70R14 84T kesärengas -arvostelut
Perustuu 51 arvosteluun
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22. lokakuuta 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. huhtikuuta 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. huhtikuuta 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. tammikuuta 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. tammikuuta 2021
