Canon EF 16-35 mm f/4L IS USM laajakulmazoom
Canon EF 16-35 mm f/4L IS USM laajakulmazoom -arvostelut
Perustuu 153 arvosteluun
One of the best wide zooms form Canon, sharp and handles distortion well. The 35mm is better than 24-105mm f4 L IS II
One of the best wide zooms form Canon, sharp and handles distortion well. The 35mm is better than 24-105mm f4 L IS II
Ale
20. elokuuta 2025
bought as a gift for my partner as she knows what she's doing. amazing build quality and the pictures are as good as you want them to be. my only gripe is the poor packaging, for the cost would of been nice to see a sturdy box but I'm Just picking. Great product
bought as a gift for my partner as she knows what she's doing. amazing build quality and the pictures are as good as you want them to be. my only gripe is the poor packaging, for the cost would of been nice to see a sturdy box but I'm Just picking. Great product
mark
15. kesäkuuta 2021
Swapped the f/2.8 mk3 version to try this lens. Recouped a fair bit of money. Not sure why but I managed to get this through Amazon for less than £700 whereas the f/2.8 had cost me £1600. Very good image quality, having IS is useful, and is my staple for wide angle shots. Good build, weather sealed and a friendly 77mm filter thread. One of canon’s better value L series lenses.
Swapped the f/2.8 mk3 version to try this lens. Recouped a fair bit of money. Not sure why but I managed to get this through Amazon for less than £700 whereas the f/2.8 had cost me £1600. Very good image quality, having IS is useful, and is my staple for wide angle shots. Good build, weather sealed and a friendly 77mm filter thread. One of canon’s better value L series lenses.
Martin
23. lokakuuta 2020
I think this is a good value. It replaces my Canon 17-40mm lens. It is much sharper and feels like a better constructed lens.
I think this is a good value. It replaces my Canon 17-40mm lens. It is much sharper and feels like a better constructed lens.
Anthony
3. kesäkuuta 2019
I was nervous about not getting the 2.8, however Ive used it a ton to capture work for an interior designer and was super impressed. Way better for capturing interior architecture and rooms. Have had a chance to use it for landscapes or any other way yet; though I predict I will be satisfied there as well!
I was nervous about not getting the 2.8, however Ive used it a ton to capture work for an interior designer and was super impressed. Way better for capturing interior architecture and rooms. Have had a chance to use it for landscapes or any other way yet; though I predict I will be satisfied there as well!
Jessica
17. toukokuuta 2019
